EMERGING FRONTIERS: DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVES ON QUANTUM LAW IN UZBEKISTAN'S LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Keywords:
Quantum law, Uzbekistan, legal framework, technological governance, innovation policy, interdisciplinary challenges, comparative legal analysis, quantum technologies, Central Asia, emerging technologiesAbstract
This study examines the emerging field of quantum law in Uzbekistan's legal system. Using a multi-method approach, it analyzes the current state, challenges, and potential development paths. The research finds that while Uzbekistan lacks explicit quantum technology provisions, foundational elements exist for future growth. Key challenges include limited expertise and infrastructure, but opportunities for economic diversification and regional leadership are present. A comparative analysis with global leaders highlights the need for strategic development and international cooperation. The study proposes a phased approach to quantum law development, emphasizing education, soft law, and targeted legislation. It concludes that success will require sustained commitment from policymakers, scientific community engagement, and adaptive legal strategies. This research contributes to quantum law discourse from a Central Asian perspective and offers a roadmap for legal framework development in emerging technologies.
References
Uzbekistan. (1992). Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2023). Quantum Information Science Legislation. https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/quantum-information-science-legislation
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Walt, S. M. (2005). The relationship between theory and policy in international relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 23-48.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Uzbekistan. (1992). Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Article 42.
Uzbekistan. (2019). Law "On Science and Scientific Activity". Uzbekistan. (2020). Law "On Innovative Activity".
Uzbekistan. (2021). Law "On Cybersecurity".
United States Congress. (2018). National Quantum Initiative Act.
Nazarbayev University. (2022). Quantum Technology Laboratory. https://nu.edu.kz/research/research-facilities/quantum-technology-laboratory
European Commission. (2018). Quantum Technologies Flagship. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/quantum-technologies-flagship
Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2003). Quantum technology: The second quantum revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1809), 1655-1674.
Roberson, T. M., & White, A. G. (2019). Charting the path to commercial quantum computing. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(12), 709-710.
Lemley, M. A. (2018). The surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. In Dreyfuss, R. C., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.), The law and theory of trade secrecy: A handbook of contemporary research (pp. 109-139). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ghosh, S., & Prakash, A. (2019). Quantum annealing with weak measurements. Quantum Information Processing, 18(4), 118.
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002). Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 145.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Main Science and Technology Indicators. https://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm
Dorbeck-Jung, B. R., Boucher, P., Schrempf, B., & Osseweijer, P. (2020). Governing with ignorance: Understanding the Australian building and construction industry's response to the challenges of nanotechnology. NanoEthics, 14(1), 5-22.
Marchant, G. E., & Wallach, W. (2015). Coordinating technology governance. Issues in Science and Technology, 31(4), 43-50.
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435.
International Telecommunication Union. (2022). Quantum Information Technology for Networks. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/qit4n/
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Quantum computing: Progress and prospects. National Academies Press.
Uzbekistan. (2022). Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Jasanoff, S. (2016). The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. W.W. Norton & Company.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
