Legal and Regulatory Challenges in Preparing for Post-Quantum Cryptography
Keywords:
Post-quantum cryptography, Cybersecurity regulation, Quantum computing, Legal frameworks, Data protection, Compliance standards, International cooperation, Liability, Technological innovation, Cryptographic systemsAbstract
The advent of quantum computing poses significant challenges to current cryptographic systems, necessitating a global shift towards post-quantum cryptography (PQC). This paper examines the legal and regulatory hurdles in preparing for this transition. It analyzes the complex interplay between technological advancements, cybersecurity imperatives, and legal frameworks across various jurisdictions. The study highlights the urgent need for updated regulations to mandate PQC adoption, addressing issues such as implementation timelines, compliance standards, and international cooperation. Furthermore, it explores the potential legal implications for organizations failing to upgrade their systems, including liability concerns and data protection violations. The paper also discusses the role of government agencies in developing and enforcing PQC regulations, and the challenges in balancing innovation with security. By identifying key areas of concern, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on creating a robust legal foundation for the post-quantum era.
References
Campagna, M., Chen, L., Dagdelen, Ö., Ding, J., Fernick, J. K., Gisin, N., ... & Mosca, M. (2015). Quantum safe cryptography and security: an introduction, benefits, enablers and challenges. ETSI White Paper, 8(1), 1-35.
Mosca, M. (2018). Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: will we be ready?. IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(5), 38-41.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2022). Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization. Retrieved from https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/post-quantum-cryptography-standardization
European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2021). Quantum-Safe Cryptography (QSC). ETSI Technical Report. Retrieved from https://www.etsi.org/technologies/quantum-safe-cryptography
Barker, W., Polk, W., & Souppaya, M. (2020). Getting Ready for Post-Quantum Cryptography: Exploring Challenges Associated with Adopting and Using Post-Quantum Cryptographic Algorithms. NIST Cybersecurity White Paper.
Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020). Towards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access, 8, 21091-21116.
Buchmann, J., Dahmen, E., & Szydlo, M. (2009). Hash-based digital signature schemes. In Post-quantum cryptography (pp. 35-93). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Chen, L., Jordan, S., Liu, Y. K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., & Smith-Tone, D. (2016). Report on post-quantum cryptography. National Institute of Standards and Technology Internal Report, 8105.
Mavroeidis, V., Vishi, K., Zych, M. D., & Jøsang, A. (2018). The impact of quantum computing on present cryptography. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(3), 405-414.
Bernstein, D. J., & Lange, T. (2017). Post-quantum cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 188-194.
Shor, P. W. (1999). Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM review, 41(2), 303-332.
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2021). Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current state and quantum mitigation. Retrieved from https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/post-quantum-cryptography-current-state-and-quantum-mitigation
Hoffman, C., O'Gorman, B., & Roetteler, M. (2020). Legal and Policy Implications of Near-Term Quantum Computing. IEEE Security & Privacy, 18(5), 49-57.
Cartwright, A., & Bourne, V. (2019). Blockchain and the GDPR: Reconciling Privacy and Distributed Ledgers in a Quantum World. Journal of Cyber Policy, 4(3), 313-335.
Alagic, G., Alperin-Sheriff, J., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Kelsey, J., ... & Moody, D. (2019). Status report on the first round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process. National Institute of Standards and Technology Internal Report, 8240.