OPTIMIZING ADVOCACY PRACTICE THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Islombek Saburyazov Tashkent State University of Law

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, advocacy, legal practice, access to justice, professional responsibility, Uzbekistan, legal technology

Abstract

This thesis examines the optimization of advocacy practice through artificial intelligence, with specific adaptation to the Uzbek context. The study situates these findings within Uzbekistan's rapidly constructed regulatory foundation and identifies four adaptation pathways. Comparative analysis of China's smart-court reform underscores a central caution: AI embedded in the justice system is never institutionally neutral, and the advocate's adversarial independence must be deliberately preserved. The thesis concludes that, where these conditions are met, AI augments rather than replaces the Uzbek advocate – returning time to the strategy, judgment, and responsibility no algorithm can assume.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Islombek Saburyazov, Tashkent State University of Law

    Master's Degree in "Cyber Law"

References

ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility. (2024, July 29). Formal opinion 512: Generative artificial intelligence tools. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf

American Bar Association, Law Practice Division. (2025). The legal industry report 2025. Law Technology Today. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_practice/resources/law-technology-today/2025/the-legal-industry-report-2025/

Guo, [et al.]. (2026). [Title of article on China's smart courts]. Computer Law & Security Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212473X26000015

Koch, M. C. (2025, June 23). The AI legal landscape in 2025: Beyond the hype. Akerman LLP. https://www.akerman.com/en/perspectives/the-ai-legal-landscape-in-2025-beyond-the-hype.html

Surani, F., & Ho, D. E. (2024, May 23). AI on trial: Legal models hallucinate in 1 out of 6 (or more) benchmarking queries. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-trial-legal-models-hallucinate-1-out-6-or-more-benchmarking-queries

Supreme People's Court of China. (2024, December 5). [Title of announcement on national legal AI infrastructure]. https://english.court.gov.cn/2024-12/05/c_1053706.htm

Tashkent State University of Law. (n.d.). The Ministry of Justice, KOICA, and Tashkent State University of Law will digitalize legal services. https://tsul.uz/en/news/1387/University/The-Ministry-of-Justice,-KOICA,-and-Tashkent-State-University-of-Law-will-digitalize-legal-services

Uzbek Bar Association. (n.d.). [Presentation on advocate statistics in Uzbekistan] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/live/Yb67IFKJw5o

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

OPTIMIZING ADVOCACY PRACTICE THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN UZBEKISTAN. (2026). International Conference on Legal Sciences, 5(1). https://science-zone.org/conference/article/view/175

Similar Articles

61-69 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.