RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND LAW IN A PUBLIC POLICY CLAUSE IN DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Asal Juraeva Tashkent State University of Law

Keywords:

arbitration; choice of law; international commerce; public policy

Abstract

Whenever scientists from different countries tried to figure out the legal content and meaning of the public policy clause, a pattern was discovered that made it difficult to achieve the desired result.  When studying the public policy clause, the connection between law and politics is most clearly and vividly observed, and even more, the suppression of law by politics in a particular country.

References

New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, 1958

UNCITRAL Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, (2016)

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States, International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Disputes, (1965)

Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, (1980)

European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, (1961)

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, (1976)

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Arbitration, (1985)

Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 1994 (UNIDROIT)

Statue of the International Court of Justice, (1945)

The Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States of, (1965)

G. Born, International Commercial Arbitration: law and practice, Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands (2012) e-ISBN 978-90-411-4675-5

Broches, Aron, Commentary on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publisher, Deventer (1990), ISBN 90 6544 507 2

Chukwumerije, Okezie, Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration, Quorum Books, Westport, CT (1994), ISBN 0-89930-878-3

Hunter, Martin and Redfern, Alan, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Third Edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London (1999), ISBN 0-421-561 300

Plender, Richard and Wilderspin, Michael, The European Contracts Convention: The Rome Convention on the Choice of Law for Contracts, Second Edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London (2001), ISBN 0 421 73860 X

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, Boilerplate clauses, international commercial contracts and the applicable law, Cambridge University Press 2011, ISBN 978-0-521-19789-2

L. Brilmayer, J. Goldsmith, E. O’Hara O’Connor, Conflict of laws: cases and materials, Wolters Kluwer in New York (2015), e-ISBN 978-1-4548-6091-4

F. Ferrari, S. Kröll, Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration, GmbH, Munich (2011), ISBN (eBook) 978-3-86653-929-7

Gillette, Clayton P., Walt, Steven D., The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: practice and theory, Cambridge University Press (2016), ISBN 9781316604168

B. Tieder, Factors to Consider in the Choice of Procedural and Substantive Law in International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2003, Volume 20 Issue 4) pp. 393 – 407

Diana Qiu, A Comparative Analysis of the Approaches used to determine the Four Laws of Commercial Arbitration, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb); Sweet & Maxwell 2020, Volume 86 Issue 1) pp. 50 – 67

Barraclough and Waincymer, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Mandatory Rules of Law in International Commercial Arbitration, (2005), page 210-211

van den Berg, Albert Jan, Planning Efficient arbitration Proceedings, The law Applicable in International Arbitration, International Council for Commercial Arbitration Congress series no. 7, Vienna, 3-6 November 1994, Kluwer Law International, (1999), ISBN 9041102248

Blessing, Marc, Regulations in Arbitration Rules on Choice of Law, International Council for Commercial Arbitration Congress series no. 7, Vienna, 3-6 November 1994, Kluwer Law International, (1999).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Juraeva, A. (2024). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND LAW IN A PUBLIC POLICY CLAUSE IN DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS. International Conference on Legal Sciences, 2(2). Retrieved from https://science-zone.org/conference/article/view/101