XALQARO OMMAVIY HUQUQDA SUDLAR TOMONIDAN INVESTORLAR VA DAVLATLAR O‘RTASIDA QO‘LLANILADIGAN ISBOTLASH TAMOYILLARI: ISBOTLASH YUKI VA STANDARTLARI

Authors

  • Xolisxon Umarova

Keywords:

xorijiy investitsiya, isbotlash yuki, isbotlash standardlari., foreign investment, burden of proof, standards of proof

Abstract

Bir martalik savdo shartnomalaridan farqli ravishda, xorijiy investitsiya shartnomalari aksariyat hollarda investor va mezbon davlat o‘rtasidagi uzoqroq muddatdagi munosabatlarni tartibga solishga qaratilgan bo‘lishi bilan ajralib turadi. Bunday shartnomalarni tuzishda esa unda javobgarlik masalalarini oldindan belgilash, nizo kelib chiqqan taqdirda uni qanday vositalar va usullar bilan hal qilish mumkinligini kelishib olish har qachongidan ham muhim ahamiyat kasb etadi. Nega deganda, mahalliy darajada tuzilgan shartnomalarda nizolarni sudda hal etish bo‘yicha sudlovlilik va taalluqlilik masalalari bo‘yicha milliy qonunchilikka tayansak, xorijiy element aks etgan shartnomalar bo‘yicha shartnomada kelishilgan sudlovlik qoidalari, xalqaro huquqning umume’tirof etilgan prinsiplari bilan ham kelishimizga to‘g‘ri keladi. Quyidagi maqola orqali xalqaro ommaviy huquqda sudlar tomonidan investorlar va davlatlar o‘rtasida qo‘llaniladigan isbotlash tamoyillari, isbotlash yuki va standardlari bir necha amaliy misollar bilan tahlil qilinadi. 

Unlike one-time trade agreements, foreign investment agreements are distinguished by the fact that in most cases they are aimed at regulating long-term relations between the investor and the host country. When concluding such agreements, it is more important than ever to determine the issues of liability in advance, and to agree on the means and methods to resolve a dispute if it arises. Because when we rely on the national legislation on the issues of jurisdiction and applicability for resolving disputes in court in contracts concluded at the local level, in the contracts with international elements we shoul deal with international standards, jurisdiction and generally recognized principles. Through the following article, the principles of proof used by courts between investors and states in public international law, as well as burden and standards of proof are analysed with several practical examples.

Author Biography

Xolisxon Umarova

Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti
Xususiy huquq fakulteti 3-bosqich talabasi

Student of Tashkent State University of Law

References

Principles of International Investment Law. Rudolf Dolzer and Christopher SChreuer. 2008. P.211

Burden and Standards of proof. Vischer AG. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=37bcab98-af79-4e83-b71a-0bdde3a02de9

Convention on settlement of investment disputes betwwn states and nationalsof other states. March 18, 1965.

Michael A.Losco. Charting a new course:Metal-tech v. Uzbeksitan and the treatment of corruption in investment arbitration. Duke Law Journal. Volume 64. November 2014.

Abdikhakimov, I. (2023, January). Trademark and copyright infringements in social media. In Science-Zone Online Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 187-200).

Burden and Standards of proof. Vischer AG. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=37bcab98-af79-4e83-b71a-0bdde3a02de9

Fuqarolik ishlarini sudda ko‘rishda isbotlash va dalillar. Monografiya. Esonova. .Xabibullayev.I.Salimova.Toshkent-2015. 14-bet.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Iqtisodiy protsessual kodeksi. 01.04.2018.

Michael A.Losco. Charting a new course:Metal-tech v. Uzbeksitan and the treatment of corruption in investment arbitration. Duke Law Journal. Volume 64. November 2014.

Waguih Elie George Siag and Clorinda Vecchi v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/15

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Hukumati va Isroil Davlati Hukumati o‘rtasida Investitsiyani o‘zaro rag‘batlantirish va himoya qilish to‘g‘risidagi bitim. 4 iyul. 1994

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2021). United Nations. Vienna,2021

Абдихакимов, И. (2023). SUG ‘URTA FRANSHIZASI VA UNING TURLARI HAQIDA. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари/Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук/Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 3(2), 176-180.

The investment Treaty arbitration Review: Evidenca and Proof. Martin Wiebecke. Anwaltsburo Wiebecke. 14 June 2022 https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-investment-treaty-arbitration-review/evidence-and-proof

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Hukumati va Ozarbayjon Respublikasi Hukumati o‘rtasidagi investitsiyalarni o‘zaro rag‘batlantirish va himoya qilish to‘g‘risida bitim. 1996 yil 27 may. Boku.

Vladislav Kim and others v.Respublic of Uzbekistan. (ICSID case No.ARB/13/6)

Abdikhakimov, I. (2023). Legal Aspects of Social Media Marketing Contracts. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 4(1), 125-130.

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2021). United Nations. Vienna,2021

North Amrica Free Trade Agreement. December 17, 1992

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Umarova, X. (2023). XALQARO OMMAVIY HUQUQDA SUDLAR TOMONIDAN INVESTORLAR VA DAVLATLAR O‘RTASIDA QO‘LLANILADIGAN ISBOTLASH TAMOYILLARI: ISBOTLASH YUKI VA STANDARTLARI. International Conference on Legal Sciences, 1(3), 30–46. Retrieved from https://science-zone.org/index.php/conference/article/view/37