NEW LEGAL SUBJECTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CIVIL LAW PERSPECTIVES
Keywords:
digital age, legal subjects, artificial intelligence, robots, virtual objects, digital assets, civil law, legal status, international standardsAbstract
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the theoretical foundations and legal status of emerging legal subjects in the digital age. It examines the challenges of determining the legal status of artificial intelligence systems, robots, virtual and augmented reality objects, cryptocurrencies, and other digital assets. The article explores existing international experience, identifies legal issues, and proposes solutions. Detailed recommendations are provided for developing international standards and improving national legislation.
References
[1] Bryson, J. J., Diamantis, M. E., & Grant, T. D. (2017). Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 273-291.
[2] Solum, L. B. (1992). Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4), 1231-1287.
[3] Čerka, P., Grigienė, J., & Sirbikytė, G. (2017). Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? Computer Law & Security Review, 33(5), 685-699.
[4] Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 15-26.
[5] European Parliament. (2017). Civil Law Rules on Robotics. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)).
[6] Lemley, M. A., & Volokh, E. (2018). Law, virtual reality, and augmented reality. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(5), 1051-1138.
[7] Fairfield, J. A. (2021). Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law Journal, 97(4), 1261-1310.
[8] European Parliament. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain: Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion.
[9] Goforth, C. R. (2019). How blockchain could increase the need for and availability of contractual ordering for companies and their investors. North Dakota Law Review, 94(1), 1-64.
[11] Kingston, J. K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and legal liability. In Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII (pp. 269-279). Springer, Cham.
[12] Yanisky-Ravid, S., & Liu, X. (2017). When artificial intelligence systems produce inventions: An alternative model for patent law at the 3A era. Cardozo Law Review, 39, 2215.
[14] Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer Nature.
[15] Svantesson, D. J. (2019). Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report 2019. Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network.
